Movie Review- X-Men Days of Future Past

001 xmen-days-of-future-past

I wanted to see this film in theaters, but do to unseen circumstances, I had to wait for it to come out on DVD. One of my friends loaned it to me and then I watched the masterpiece of a movie that director Bryan Singer pulled together. Aside from The Dark Knight trilogy and Marvel’s The Avengers, the X-Men film franchise is one of my favorite series.

We see our favorite characters from the original series: Storm, Iceman, Shadowcat, Colossus and from X-Men First Class, like Havok and Beast, but what brings them together? The older & younger Professor X and Magneto, but also Wolverine. Shadowcat uses her power to send Wolverine back in time to the 1970s before Mystique can be captured and her powers used to create the Sentinels. At first, they only attacked mutants, but soon the world grew dark as they conquered everyone.

What follows is an awesome thrill that makes X-Men: The Last Stand and X-Men Origins: Wolverine a bad dream. This by far, the best non-Marvel Cinematic Universe film and the best X-Men movie by far. The effects, the acting, directing, and the overall story is one of the best superhero movies I’ve ever scene.

PARENTAL CONCERNS: Language, violence, sci-fi action & mayhem


  • Hugh Jackman as Logan / Wolverine
  • James McAvoy and Patrick Stewart as Charles Xavier / Professor X
  • Michael Fassbender and Ian McKellen as Erik Lehnsherr / Magneto
  • Jennifer Lawrence as Raven Darkhölme / Mystique
  • Halle Berry as Ororo Munroe / Storm
  • Nicholas Hoult and Kelsey Grammer as Hank McCoy / Beast
  • Anna Paquin as Marie / Rogue
  • Ellen Page as Kitty Pryde / Shadowcat
  • Peter Dinklage as Bolivar Trask
  • Shawn Ashmore as Bobby Drake / Iceman
  • Omar Sy as Bishop
  • Evan Peters as Peter Maximoff / Quicksilver
  • Daniel Cudmore as Peter Rasputin / Colossus
  • Fan Bingbing as Clarice Ferguson / Blink
  • Adan Canto as Sunspot
  • Booboo Stewart as James Proudstar / Warpath
  • Josh Helman as Major William Stryker
  • Brian Cox, who portrayed General Stryker in X2, appears in archive footage.

Age of Ultron VS Dawn of Justice

001 Avengers-JL

If you’ve read this blog for any amount of time, you know I’m a die-hard Batman fan. I celebrated his 75th anniversary with a whole month of Bat-themed posts. However, I find myself more excited about Avengers: Age of Ultron than Batman V Superman- Dawn of Justice. Why is that?

Well, for one thing, the Marvel Cinematic Universe is allowing their characters to grow and change, and be well, heroic. DC, meanwhile, In an attempt to make their seem “realistic,” has opted instead to make their heroes brooding whiners. “Oh no, I got powers. My parents got murdered. I have a ring that is controlled by will. Help! Help! What do I do?” It’s very annoying.

Also, Marvel takes strides to at least somewhat please the fans: Captain America’s costume, Joss Whedon is directing, Black Widow’s stingers, Howard the Duck, etc. DC totally ignores its fans: Ben Affleck as Batman, not naming the Batman/Superman film World’s Finest, Zack Snyder is directing, did I mention Ben Affleck is Batman?

Agents of SHIELD introduced Deathlok and recently Mockingbird. Gotham is taking great pains NOT to introduce Batman making it just a cop show. Arrow is using BATMAN villains, not Green Arrow rogues. Marvel is giving two female heroes, Jessica Jones and Agent Carter, their own shows. DC just green-lighted a Supergirl show. Really? The only thing we want from Marvel is to convince Disney to give out the money to buy Spider-Man from Sony. That’s possible now since The Amazing Spider-Man 2 didn’t do so hot.

I’m also annoyed by the extremes Batman is going. They refuse to show Batman in his prime even though The Dark Knight was a huge success. They either want him too young to do anything or he’s going to be old and tired. I want to see Batman kick some… you get the idea.

Maybe with the success of the Marvel Cinematic Universe films, it’ll motivate DC to do better.  Let’s hope so for the Justice League’s sake.

Movie Review- Austenland

Directed by Jerusha Hess and starring Keri Russell (Felicity, August Rush, etc.) comes one of the most random comeidc  movies I have ever seen in my life.

The story goes that Jane Hayes is addicted and obsessed with the world of Jane Austen. Mr. Darcy is her fantasy and she even keeps a standie of Colin Firth as Mr. Darcy. Her entire apartment is decorated with elements from the Regency era of English history. Her friends thinks she nuts. Why? Because everything about her life revolves around Jane Austen.

She uses her life savings to journey to Austenland, a recreation of the Regency period that features actors who are suppose to be based on a particular character in the Jane Austen novels. After she arrives, whirlwind romances, reality/fiction confusion, and a whole lot of Pride & Prejudice quotes fling your way.

As a movie, the film is choppy in its storytelling and jumping from scene to scene. It is decently acted, even with only Keri Russell as the only A-lister, the cast manages to convince you of who they are playing. As a comedy, it often fails, but redeems itself with its one-liners, especially from JJ Feild (who plays the “Mr. Darcy” character). My sister was (and to a lesser extent is) a Jane Austen aficionado, so the humor and parody of certain elements was not lost on me. The best way to describe it is, it is Napoleon Dynamite for ladies, but especially for Jane Austen fans.

PARENTAL CONCERNS: Language, mild thematic elements, innuendo, crude humor


  • Keri Russell as Jane Hayes
  • JJ Feild as Mr. Henry Nobley
  • Bret McKenzie as Martin
  • Jennifer Coolidge as Elizabeth Charming
  • James Callis as Colonel Andrews
  • Jane Seymour as Mrs. Wattlesbrook
  • Georgia King as Lady Amelia Heartwright
  • Ricky Whittle as Captain George East
  • Rupert Vansittart as Mr. Wattlesbrook

The Art of Giving and Receiving


Words of wisdom from a friend & colleague. Check out more of her posts at

Originally posted on Common Unity:

Today, I want to shine some light on the subject of giving to members of your community. A one-time gift to a traveling preacher or a reputable ministry is easy. Giving to that person you’ll see every week sometimes comes with a degree of messiness. Some people are natural at giving and receiving. Others are like me and need a lot of help. This post is for us.

I’m going to start with a story to illustrate some of the mess I’ve faced in giving and then break it down into the reasons for those problems. This is a fabricated a mash-up of countless times I’ve either given or received the wrong way or people in my community have (I didn’t want to embarrass any friends or myself too much). I hope I’m not alone in my struggles and that you’ll also relate to the parable of the un-cheerful giver…

View original 1,600 more words

Religion is NOT a dirty word

01 religion background

I’m sure you’ve heard the saying, “Christianity is not a religion, it’s a relationship.” I am sorry to say, that’s just not true. 

I know I am going to take a lot of heat for this, but I have got to get this out there. I am saying this of my own freewill. The views and opinions expressed in this article are wholly my own. This is not the opinions of my sponsors

Let me be clear, I believe in a personal relationship with our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. I believe that it is possible and that Holy Spirit is alive and active on Earth today. That being said, the notion that religion or being religious is a problem in the Christian faith is just not so.

I grew up in the 90s and into the early 2000s. In the former, there was a clamor where freethinking ministers wanting to get out of the “mold” told folks that they did not want to do “church” anymore. This was a popular rallying cry that carried into the 2000s, but then church pastors noticed something. Folks stopped going to church. Church itself, the communion of the saints of Christ, became taboo. 

Well, this would not do, so the freethinking ministers came up with a new rallying cry, “We don’t do religion.” The words religion and religious became the new buzz words synonymous with things that were considered a part of the powerless Gospel. For instance, an evangelism that was abrasive and confrontational. The Bible does say that without love, that is nothing. 

However, it soon spread to represent everything wrong with the church. “Oh, your church doesn’t allow women in leadership? That’s so religious!” Women should be allowed to be leaders in the church, that’s not the point. The point is the word religion or religious become sistered with a Pharisee or Pious spirit. Religion is not the word that defines that. According to the dictionary, religion simply means:

a specific fundamental set of beliefs and practices generally agreed upon by a number of persons or sects; or something one believes in and follows devotedly; a point or matter of ethics or conscience

That’s not sinister in the slightest. What’re some fundamentals of our faith? We believe in God the Father, almighty Maker of Heaven and Earth. In Jesus Christ His only begotten Son. We believe in Holy Spirit, who is alive and active. The Bible is the written inspired Word of God. We believe that Jesus Christ was born of a virgin, lived, died, and on the third day, He rose again. Those are beliefs that we hold dear to our hearts. 

When we say Christianity is not a religion or religion is the weakness of our faith, we are undermining ourselves and making us look like fools. Do a search on the web about this and you will find whole atheistic websites dedicated to making fun of Christians who say, “I don’t believe in a religion. I believe in Jesus.”

Of course, when atheists do this and then they say “atheism isn’t a religion,” they are being hypocrites, but that’s not the topic. 

The point is, Christianity is a religion. Don’t believe me? Turn to the Bible itself. 

26 If anyone thinks he is religious without controlling his tongue, then his religion is useless and he deceives himself. 27 Pure and undefiled religion before our God and Father is this: to look after orphans and widows in their distress and to keep oneself unstained by the world. James 1:26-27 (HCSB, emphasis mine)

Still think Christianity isn’t a religion? 

The word we should be using in place of religion is “religiosity.” This is a word for being pious and thinking that you are better because of your beliefs. Also that you put faith in the “practice” of your religion instead of the deity (Jesus) Himself. This was the buzz word in the 70s and 80s. Ministers would declare, “Throw off your man-made religiosity!” This was correct. However, it was too hard to say for some, so it became “religion” then “church” and back to “religion.” 

Listen, we must throw off these pretentious semantics and get back to what is truly important: the love of Jesus. That is what truly matters. Religion is not the weakness of the Kingdom of God. The Kingdom has no weakness. It always advances and it never retreats!

Book Review- Candy Pizza

001 candy-pizza3

I started reading blogger Charlotte Cuevas poetry blog about a year ago. It was in the middle of her doing a 365 poems in 365 days. From that challenge, came her self-published book: Candy Pizza!

The book’s poetry is a mixed bag of goodies! It has poetry for the deep thinkers, the comedy lovers, the life explorers, and pretty much everything in between! I only wish it had more poems in it. Maybe that will come from Candy Pizza 2. “Hint, hint, Charlotte.” I highly recommend it for its insight, humor, depth, and just all around common sense.
Check it out and don’t forget to check out the author’s blog either: